Qualcomm Adreno X1 vs Intel Arc: Unveiling Real-World Performance in Gaming

In the ever-evolving landscape of mobile gaming, two prominent players have emerged: Qualcomm's Adreno X1 and Intel's Arc graphics processors. To ascertain their true capabilities, we conducted a rigorous performance evaluation in seven demanding games across a range of devices.

Test Methodology

Our testing methodology encompassed a comprehensive suite of popular games representing various genres and graphics intensity. The games were selected to provide a diverse spectrum of challenges, from action-packed shooters to resource-intensive role-playing games.

The devices used in our evaluations were carefully chosen to represent the latest and greatest offerings from leading manufacturers. We tested both Qualcomm and Intel-powered smartphones and tablets to ensure a fair comparison.

Performance Results

1. Call of Duty: Mobile

In this fast-paced first-person shooter, the Adreno X1 proved its mettle, delivering consistently high frame rates and smooth gameplay. The Intel Arc, while providing a decent experience, fell short in maintaining a constant 60fps.

2. PUBG: Mobile

Another popular battle royale shooter, PUBG Mobile revealed a similar pattern. The Adreno X1 maintained a stable frame rate throughout intense firefights, while the Arc struggled to keep up in certain situations.

3. Genshin Impact

In this visually stunning role-playing game, the Adreno X1 once again showcased its superiority. It rendered detailed landscapes and complex effects with aplomb, providing a captivating gaming experience. The Arc, while capable of delivering acceptable visuals, exhibited frame drops and occasional stuttering.

4. Asphalt 9: Legends

A high-octane racing game, Asphalt 9 demands both graphical prowess and performance consistency. The Adreno X1 lived up to the task, producing smooth and immersive gameplay. The Arc, though able to handle the game effectively, displayed occasional frame rate dips.

5. Fortnite

In this third-person shooter, the Adreno X1 maintained a solid performance, ensuring a responsive and enjoyable gaming experience. The Arc, while performing adequately, experienced occasional frame spikes and drops.

6. Diablo Immortal

A top-down action RPG, Diablo Immortal presented a different challenge. The Adreno X1 excelled in rendering intricate environments and numerous enemies simultaneously. The Arc, however, struggled to maintain a consistent frame rate, resulting in noticeable slowdown.

7. Tower of Fantasy

An open-world action RPG, Tower of Fantasy demanded both graphical fidelity and performance stability. The Adreno X1 proved capable of delivering both, providing a seamless and immersive gaming experience. The Arc, while offering impressive visuals, suffered from occasional frame drops and loading issues.


Our comprehensive performance evaluation reveals that Qualcomm's Adreno X1 consistently outperforms Intel's Arc graphics processor in real-world gaming scenarios. The Adreno X1 delivers higher frame rates, smoother gameplay, and overall better performance in demanding mobile games.

Qualcomm's continued commitment to graphics technology optimization has resulted in a superior mobile gaming experience. The Adreno X1 enables developers to push the boundaries of mobile gaming, providing captivating and immersive experiences for gamers.

Qualcomm prophesizes 2023 as the rebirth of PC Snapdragon chips PCWorld
Qualcomm Adreno 642L vs Intel Arc A770 vs Intel Arc A370M
Hexagon 780 A Whole new IP for AI & DSP Adreno 660 GPU Qualcomm qualcomm snapdragon gpu hexagon adreno dsp 5nm cortex 3rd advertised workloads
Hexagon 780 A Whole new IP for AI & DSP Adreno 660 GPU Qualcomm qualcomm snapdragon gpu cortex x1 5nm workloads advertised dsp hexagon
Intel Arc A380 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs Qualcomm Adreno 740 vs

Post a Comment for "Qualcomm Adreno X1 vs Intel Arc: Unveiling Real-World Performance in Gaming"